Liberals Gone Wild–Feminist Claptrap

Now that the inauguration is over, we can now get on to governing. Unfortunately, the basic business of government is colossally boring.

I could care less about confirmation hearings. I react when people actually do things. Is there hypocrisy when it comes to liberal nominees in terms of much lighter scrutiny? Sure. If I elaborated your heads would hit the keyboard.

I could talk about Israel, but they surrendered, and until and unless Benjmain Bibi Netanyahu returns to power, Israel will be run by weaklings that enjoy losing wars. As in America, sending a liberal to do a man’s job doesn’t work.

I have zero interest in the culture wars.

So what is left?

The topic that got me into blogging in the first place, combating ideological bigotry.

Braack Obama may be a good, decent man, but many of his supporters are contemptible individuals that fantasize about drinking the blood from republicans. I am sure any day now they will demand that President Obama send armed guards to arrest George W. Bush. They will never let go.

Yet ideological bigotry will be with us until every last leftist hatemonger is brought to justice and forced to confront their own viciousness. For those wondering why I do not go after ideological bigotry on the right, there are two reasons. First of all, it is significantly less. We criticize our own hateful fringe element, while the left embraces them with french kisses and showers with them, using poison speech as body shower gel. The second reason is because there are 50 billion media places to go to find criticism of the right. The need for another one would be about as useful as another palace dedicated to Saddam in Iraq.

So until actual news happens that I care about, my ongoing series of liberals gone wild will be rolled out as a subsection of ideological bigotry.

Between Palestinians, the Jayson Blair Times, the Los Angeles Palestinian Times, the Washington Compost, most liberal Synagogues, The Axis of Anti-Semitism (Huffington Post, Moveon.org, Daily Kos), MSNBC, and the rest of the frothing left wing dogs, there will always be plenty of evidence to report.

Yet the one group that will continue to be the gift that keeps on giving comes in the form of the truest bat spit crazy group on Earth…feminists.

They spread clap. They won’t shut their trap. Combining the two, they offer…claptrap.

Now before somebody claim that I am against all women, let me make the record perfectly clear. One can be absolutely hostile towards feminists without hating all women. Not all Arabs are terrorists, and not all women are feminists.

More importantly, the feminists are the true haters of women. They are the politics of division, segregating women by class, beauty, and ideology.

One of the most controversial columns I have written was entitled “Light a Candle, Smack a Woman.” An imbecile or feminist grievance monger would think that I was attacking women. I was attacking liberals for being hypocrites and not sticking up for all women.

http://tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/lighting-candles-and-smacking-women-2008-hanukkah-style/

In the spirit of Hanukkah I listed the 8 situations where abuse of women was acceptable. I don’t make these rules. Liberals do, making it more ironic when I confront them with their own behavior.

Today’s liberal feminist gone wild is Jill Zimmerman, a legislative assistant at the Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism.

Based on what I saw on their website, the The Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism is similar to the People’s Democratic Republic of North Korea. It contains words that do not seem to fit. These people may be Jewish, but the website was heavy on left wing social causes and very light on actual Judaism, which I have been practicing since I was a child. That is their right of course, but the idea that liberalism equals Judaism is the very thing I am trying to fight for the benefit of Jews everywhere.

Now for those wondering why this Ms. Zimmerman woman is on my radar, it is very simple. She pulled out a verbal knife, and now I need to bring out the verbal bazooka. It is what I do. I am good at it. I had no idea who she was until she decided to attack me personally rather than discuss substance. As a feminist, she simply may have none.

Her bile is below. I did not link to her site because I do not link to hate sites.

“Apparently intended to be comedic, this blog post is every bit as appallingly offensive as it sounds.”

Yeah, for those that get offended by everything. Fine, so I push buttons. Good writing does that. Perhaps she prefers more sophisticated humor, such as throwing Birkenstocks at George W. Bush. or burning pro-life evangelicals in effigy.

“According to The Tygrrrr Express, ‘women have been up in arms looking for ways to exact vengeance on the male gender.’ Feminism–the belief in the right of women to have political, social, and economic equality with men–the blog writes, ‘is about attempting to destroy men.’
Am I missing the punch line?”

Yes, because there was no punch line. I was being serious. Part of being humorless, aka a feminist, is to get indignant over humor and seriousness, fail to tell the difference, and avoid embarrassment by just never smiling about anything. Facial tics should not be mistaken for smiles.

Ms. Zimmerman decided to then do the best thing she could have possibly done…she proved my point lock, stock, and crate and barrel.

She made a list of 8 reasons why she is proud to be a feminist. For the sake of honesty, not all 8 of her reasons are completely ludicrous. In fact, some of them even have merit. Luckily for me, the laughable ones more than make up for this.

Naturally, she lauds Gloria Steinem, who made it clear that women did not need men. Many women ended up broke, broken and bitter following her advice, at which point she got married because she wanted the companionship. Men and women need each other, but unfortunately too many feminists prefer rage over more healthy human emotions.

Issues such as equal work for equal pay are what feminists should be about. Abortion should not. More importantly, pro-life women can still be feminists.

Below are my comments that I left on her site.

“Ms. Zimmerman,

Your response to my article was pure hypocrisy, and your ‘disgust’ is based on deliberate cherry picking.

Unless a woman is willing to celebrate the achievements of ALL women, including Sarah Palin, they are no feminist.

Unless women criticize the abuse of women by ALL men, including Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton, they are no feminist.

Feminism is a joke because it does not stand up for all women. It selects and chooses based on political ideology.

I do not expect you to print my comments, nor have you rebutted them. Just know that when Laura Bush, Condi Rice, and Sarah Palin face large heapings of abuse, it is me, not feminists, that speak up to defend them.

Oh, and George W. Bush freed Afghani and Iraqi women. The feminists said nothing.

Respectfully,

eric aka the Tygrrrr Express”

I will give Ms. Zimmerman credit. She actually did print my remarks. Perhaps she has not gotten around to removing them.

Yet my comments were never acknowledged either. So either Ms. Zimmerman completely agrees with me, or has time to throw verbal bombs but not to defuse them.

Feminism has truly become a disgusting element of our society. Any movement that lauds Hillary Clinton as a champion of women while castigating Sarah Palin, the second coming of Supermom, is a movement that needs to meet a quick and ruinous end.

No, I am not endorsing domestic violence. The movement should be killed, not the people.

My challenge to Ms. Zimmerman remains the same. Either stand up for all women, or drop the feminist label. She has every right to be a left wing activist. That involves helping trees, bunny rabbits, and zygotes. It has nothing to do with women.

George W. Bush freed Afghani and Iraqi women. Laura Bush has raised breast cancer awareness in Saudi Arabia. Hillary rode her husband’s coattails while he was chasing other women’s tails. Hillary then used her power that she got solely through him to destroy these women.

In the same way I have done more to help black America than Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton by merely not making matters worse, I have done more to advance the cause of real women than any feminist grievance monger ever could. After all, they make matters worse.

So yes, I respect women. I have contempt for man-hating anti-conservative bigots.

I would ask feminists to shut up and cook my dinner, but then I would have to be in the room with them listening to them prattle. I would rather enjoy a meal at a restaurant with a republican Jewish brunette. The company would be better. After all, there would be no feminists in the room spreading their anti-republican bigoted claptrap agenda disguised as social advancement.

eric

17 Responses to “Liberals Gone Wild–Feminist Claptrap”

  1. RAD says:

    eric
    I am a child of the 60’s and so was exposed to the feminist movement at it’s birth. I never really got it. They wanted me to feel like a victim and to parlay that victimhood into advancement. Something I could never do. Was I a victim of discrimination? You bet. Did I ever feel like a victim? Not once. So their feminist claptrap never made sense to me. It wasn’t until Sarah Palin came on the scene that I finally understood the true meaning of “feminism”. I listened to her speak, followed her thought processes and boom – the light went on. I finally get it. Probably something that would profoundly confuse the founders of the “feminist movement”. I am smiling at the thought.

  2. Micky 2 says:

    Excellent, but you left out the liberal guilty moronic patronizing just lookin for a piece of tail men on the left who claim to be feminists.

    I can defend any particular minorities right to not be discriminated against.
    But will never pretend to know what it feels like to of gone thru what they went thru or are going thru.

  3. Why would a feminist support a woman who is not a feminist? And plenty of ferminists decried the hypocritical actions of people like the Kennedys and Bill Clinton, but they also recognized the laws these people supported, signed and enforced on their behalf.

    I think men who have a problem with feminism really just have deep-seated problems with women.

    JMJ

  4. blacktygrrrr says:

    That is like saying we can praise the KKK for helping build roads or praise Louis Farrakhan for preaching to young black men to be more responsible.

    Any good deeds are automatically negated by the bad deeds.

    As for choosing Hillary Clinton over Sarah Palin, perhaps we should revisit the subjects of the various “bimbo eruptions,” and ask them.

    Also, calling women bimbos is sexist. It was the Clinton team that coined that term, not me. The feminists accepted it.

    eric

  5. Micky 2 says:

    “I think men who have a problem with feminism really just have deep-seated problems with women.”

    I had no problem with them until after the 60s when they stopped burning their bras and going without them.

    We dont have a problem with feminists.
    We have a problem with women who think they are entitled to be hypersensative b*tchs and be worshipped for it.
    Theres nothing deep seated about it.
    Its just an instantaneous reaction that most people would have
    to a bad person.
    I’ll look at the broad crosseyed because her behavior is outstandingly dumb.
    She’ll not accept the blame for her character defects and instead say we dont get along only because I have some deep seated problem with women.
    Typical lib, claim some minority status as the root of their problem instead of taking the personal resposability of admitting they are the problem.

  6. “Any good deeds are automatically negated by the bad deeds.”

    That’s an awfully simplistic way of looking at things. You have to balance the weight of the deeds and put them in context. For example, when people criticize Robert Byrd for his membership in the KKK, they have to balance that against the good he’s done for minorities, his later denunciation of the KKK, and the fact that he’s a 91 year old man from West Virginia. Given the context and his good deeds, his membership in the KKK seems less significant.

    Feminists chose Hillary Clinton over Sarah Palin because Clinton is an outspoken advocate for women’s issues and Palin is not. Clinton is a highly educated and experienced stateswoman and Palin is not. Clinton is a Democrat which means she’s more amenable to women’s rights groups than are Republicans and Palin is a Republican. Of course women’s rights groups will choose Clinton over Palin. What do you expect? That would be like me telling you that you should be a Democrat just because there are more Jewish Democrats than Jewish Republicans. If you’re only criteria was being Jewish, by your own standard here, you’d have to be Democrat. No, instead you choose your party based on your personal beliefs and interests. Let me put it this way – If Ron Wyden ran for president against Rudy Giuliani, would you vote for Wyden? Would voting for Giuliani somehow make you a claptrapping hypocrite?

    Micky, women have been subjugated by men for time immemorium. Any decent person should be able to both recognize that and want to remediate it. That’s all a feminist is. Patriarchy is not a natural phenomenon. It’s a deliberate social construct created by and for men. It is bullying in it’s purest and most obvious form. This is not about character or personal responsibility. It’s about changing political and social constructs so as to make the world a fairer and better place for women. That’s all. What problem any man would have with that only makes me question that man’s values and psychological security.

    JMJ

  7. Brat says:

    THAT has always been my problem with the feminists. They support a woman as long as she follows their idea of womanhood. IF a woman does not follow in their wake, then she is not worth supporting. As you so rightly say, Sarah Palin showed most of the feminists for what they truly are: hypocrites.

    Sarah Palin has been far too busy living her life, making HER choices that work for her, that she has no time to blindly follow the feminist mantra.

    According to feminists, every woman has the right to choose, as long as they choose whatever is the “feminist-approved” issue du jour.

  8. Brat says:

    And I could have gone into reams of patriarchy subjugating women etc etc.etc…but why bother? I have far too many other things to do..;)

  9. Micky 2 says:

    “That’s an awfully simplistic way of looking at things. You have to balance the weight of the deeds and put them in context. ”

    Yea, like how much time served makes up for murdering someone ?

    Bottom line is that you love to pick and choose and have it both ways.

    You dont mind killing babys yet you protect terrorists.
    I want to know what negates you into a position to be able to do that ?

    “Feminists chose Hillary Clinton over Sarah Palin because Clinton is an outspoken advocate for women’s issues and Palin is not.”

    Palin is an example of everything a feminist says you should be.
    The only problem is that shes not a dem.

    “Clinton is a highly educated and experienced stateswoman and Palin is not.”

    So let me get this right. Unless you have a degree you cant speak out for women ?
    Its amazing how feminists give Hillary a pass for disrespecting her and treating her like trash in front of the whole country yet come after Palin whos marriage is a hell of a lot more functional and respectful of each other.

    Jersey.
    Women these day are not fighting to remedeate or get rid of these things as most of the crap you’re imagining doesnt exist anymore but in third world countries and I sure as hell dont see American feminists in those countries doing anything to help them.
    They’re just a bunch of insecure broads who need a little extra attention for a bunch of problems that they only bring upon themselves.
    All they are doing is creating an atmosphere of crisis and fear to justify a stupid collectivist oppression thats not even there..

    Take your psych security along with the smuggness that brought in and tell it to someone dumb enough to buy into that crap.
    We can be gentlemen and decent human beings without a bunch of hypersensative broads cramming down our throats the way we should behave.

  10. Micky 2 says:

    Correction

    “Its amazing how feminists give Hillary a pass for letting Bill disrespect her and treating her like trash in front of the whole country yet come after Palin whos marriage is a hell of a lot more functional and respectful of each other.”

    total hypocrisy.

  11. TexasTom says:

    Jersey, I am numb. Your comment “Patriarchy is not a natural phenomenon. It’s a deliberate social construct created by and for men.” tells me you are a typical liberal. History is a dish best served awake. In past era’s, the survival of the race meant men, larger and more capable of doing prolonged labor, did just that. Women, who due to being the ONLY one’s capable of bearing children, were in a fragile state during gestation. Tending to necessary activities at home was the logical choice for them.

  12. Toma says:

    Lot a big words.

    We are all victums of something at one time or another. Making a living from ones victumization is wrong. Some may consider it brilliant.

    We are all hypocrites at times. Its a human thing. Recognizing our hypocrisy and trying to correct it is a good thing.

    Respect, I think is what is missing in this feminist group and most groups of professional victums.

    (immemorium) I looked it up, you should too.

    Toma

  13. “THAT has always been my problem with the feminists. They support a woman as long as she follows their idea of womanhood.”

    Brat, what do you think a feminist is? Feminism IS an “idea of womanhood! This is like saying, “THAT has always been my problem with the Republicans. They support a politician as long as they follow their poitical ideas.” I mean, c’mon guys! Do you hear yourselves here?

    “Yea, like how much time served makes up for murdering someone?”

    Micky, well, murder is pretty much the worst thing a person can do. It’s hard to imagine how to compensate for murder. And just because someone does do good deeds, that doesn’t just erase the bad deeds. One must atone for the bad deeds, and make recompense. Even then the bad deeds are not erased, just possibly put into a greater context.

    “You dont mind killing babys yet you protect terrorists.”

    Killing babies? Who says I kill babies? That’s a helluva thing to say! Look, no one likes abortion. I just don;t think it’s fair to put the rights of an embryo ahead of the rights of a woman.

    “Palin is an example of everything a feminist says you should be.
    The only problem is that shes not a dem.”

    I don;t know what you mean by this. How is Palin “everything a feminist says you should be?” Palin should THANK feminists for giving her the opportunity to get ahead in life, but getting ahead in and of itself is not a feminist ideal. Palin stands againt many feminists ideals, like the freedom of private choice for women to have an abortion. She also takes stands that, though not necessarily feminist, run contrary to what the vast majority of feminists believe. And yes, of course part of the problem is her party affiliation! Du-uh! What do you expect? If she was a Dem, she’s be a pretty wierd one. The Dems are more a feminist party than the GOP. I mean, c’mon! Du-uh!

    “So let me get this right. Unless you have a degree you cant speak out for women?”

    No. But in the context our good host was employing, of course the feminists “chose Clinton over Palin.” Clinton not only shares their views a heckuva lot more than Palin, but she’s just a better overall candidate, with far more education and experience. Given the CHOICE, it would strain the imagination to see feminists choosing Palin over Clinton, to say the least!

    “Women these day are not fighting to remedeate or get rid of these things as most of the crap you’re imagining doesnt exist anymore…”

    Easy for you to say. That’s the cheap con ansxwer for everything they don’t care or want to hear about. Racism? Nope. Doesn’t exist. Sexism? Nope. Doesn’t exist? Classism? Nope. Doesn’t exist. The only time these things exist in your minds is when you feel victimized by them, and your definition of “victimized” is “annoyed biased, misogynist classist.”

    “Its amazing how feminists give Hillary a pass for letting Bill disrespect her and treating her like trash…”

    And this is just a blatant display of ignorance. MAny feminists spoke out strongly against both the Clintons – Bill for his adolescent skirt-chasing and Hillary for tolerating it. You guys just don’t pay attention to feminists until they say or do something you don’t like. To quote Paul Simon, “A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.”

    Texas Tom,

    I don’t think you know anything about anthropology, let alone political history. Patriarchy is not about who’s physically strong, otherwise our society would be run by bodybuilders. I’ve got news for you – it’s not. Throughout societies, throughout human history, the dynamics and balance of political power between men and women has taken many faces. Some societies to this day are quite matriarchal. Among our closest relative species, it’s common. It’s a long and complex subject and I get the distinct feeling that you haven’t so much as taken a step into the kiddie pool on this one, so I’ll just leave you with this – if women did run the world, how would you do?

    Okay Toma, got me on the semantics. Yea for you. It’s too bad you closed your thought with those two statements, because you were right on until then. The most annoying of all professional victims for me would be those who are not victims at all – like majority or powerful interest groups who claim to be under duress (Christians in America, the NRA, the extremely cheap and wealthy…).

    JMJ

  14. Micky 2 says:

    JMJ;
    “Brat, what do you think a feminist is? Feminism IS an “idea of womanhood! This is like saying, “THAT has always been my problem with the Republicans. They support a politician as long as they follow their poitical ideas.” I mean, c’mon guys! Do you hear yourselves here?”

    Wrong !
    And once again we will use Sarah Palin as an example.
    She is every bit a feminist as any of the others. She just doesnt wear it on her sleeve and be an obnoxious vocalist about it. She goes about her life representing what she thinks a woman should be in this era. Not preaching.
    The idea of womanhood that the movement espouses should be that they are all to be respected for their “individual” characteristics.
    Unfortunatly the feministas brand of feminism in the left set up a model and doctrine of military standards casting uniqueness aside, of what that woman should be and represent.
    Do you hear the ridiculous comparison in your voice ?
    I can break from the precise model of what a republican is for example by supporting legalized pot and still be very much a republican.
    In the case with feminists on the left, if you break from the model/stereotype in the slightest that thet have designated
    then you are not a feminist in their eyes are quickly put in the stockade and castigated in front of all.

    “Killing babies? Who says I kill babies? That’s a helluva thing to say! Look, no one likes abortion. I just don;t think it’s fair to put the rights of an embryo ahead of the rights of a woman.”

    Then you are simply saying that you carry the authority to determine that of two Americans(the mother and child)one life is worth more than another and that American lives are not worth that much more than a terrorists as you place their rights ahead of our soldiers.
    By the way, supporting abortion is just as bad as those who support terrorism. You’re aiding and abetting murder when you vote for a candidate that supports a choice.
    Thats right.
    All mothers should have the choice to kill or keep their child.

    “Clinton not only shares their views a heckuva lot more than Palin, but she’s just a better overall candidate,”

    Actually, Palin best represents the standard model of a successful woman today as she also has not been in the position to be dominated by her husbands wandering lust. First because there doesnt seem to be any and second because she is woman enough to probably not tolerate it.
    Hillary on the other hand traded in her dignity and stayed by her husbands side even after it was discovered that he was a liar and a cheat.
    Tell me, would a real woman stand up to this victimization by any man ?
    Hardly.

    “it would strain the imagination to see feminists choosing Palin over Clinton, to say the least!”

    If she were a democrat they would do it in a heartbeat simply for the facts I mentioned above.
    Hillary traded her self worth and womanhood for a career in politics.
    Basically, shes a whore to her own ego.

    “MAny feminists spoke out strongly against both the Clintons ”

    Talk is cheap. The fact of the matter is that today they embrace her and use her useless trip to China on a soap box as a means to mitigate that stupidity.
    She is the one who should do the speaking for women and say that they should never tolerate such abuse in the face of a whole country.
    Of course we all know that too much of the truth will ruin any political career.

    “Patriarchy is not about who’s physically strong, ”

    It doesnt matter whos physically or politically stronger.
    The fact is, as Tom mentioned, and in this case, we are dealing with the human animal, not a political hierarchy.
    Before we had organized communities there were small tribes and the patriarchy was that of who was the biggest baddest dude.
    This actually lasted quite a while up until WW1 and 2 out of necessity right on to the early 60s when the job market began to afford opportunities to women.

    Today of course we are looking at a more complex society where brut strength no longer pays the bills or brings home the bronto burger as much as it did in the past.

    So your attempt to discredit his comparison and make him look uneducated just made you look arrogant and snobby.
    You really ought to try just going about what it is you want to say instead of always bringing your interpretation of others scholactics into the argument.
    It makes you look stupid by way of arrogance.

    ” powerful interest groups who claim to be under duress (Christians in America, the NRA, the extremely cheap and wealthy…).

    I dont see anyone trying to shove christianity down the throats of athiest or make people carry guns that dont want them.

    But on the other hand what see are special interest liberal groups that are constantly attacking these two organizations.

    And frankly I’m soooooooooo tired of the age old mentallity that always paints the rich guy as the bad guy.
    Yet no one ever turns down the money or handout and they are first the left goes to in times of finacial duress.
    Instead of actually coming up with a plan that works they just tax the crap out of the people who already pay more than half of what it takes to run the country.
    Why is it any more fair to take 60% from a man who makes 10.00 a month than it is take 60% from a man who makes 10,000.00 a month ?
    Whats yours is yours and everyone should be able to keep an equal amount of whats theirs.

  15. Micky, you guys are just pulling a bait and switch. Sarah Palin is not a feminist. Abortion is not the same as terrorism. Patriarchy is a social construct, not a natural order. No one is abusing Christians or gun owners or the wealthy. Period.

    Get real.

    JMJ

  16. Micky 2 says:

    How do you know shes not a feminist ?
    Just because shes not running around clubbing men ?
    Would you be as brave and ignorant tio assume that she does not stand up for the rights of women ?
    Its not bait and switch.
    Its a perfect example of how you’re wrong and simply cant controvert sense and a solid argument.

    “is a social construct,”

    As I mentioned the social constructs that go as far back as neaderthal tribes.

    You’re wrong, and I can prove it.
    Gun owners and Christians and the wealthy are abused constantly. Dont make me humiliate you again by showing you the evidence.

    Grow up, it aint so just cuz you say its so.
    You are the one who needs to get real and take a lesson in humility.
    Your word is not gospel or final or definite.
    Only the facts are.
    You have none, I do.

    On the last post you said that no one is trying to take our guns from us.
    Trying to take our 2nd amendnent from us is abuse.
    I showed you a list of organizations who are attempting that abuse proving your wild assertion to be wrong.

    Christians are abused by the radical secular left all the time as their churches are bombed, rioted upon and defaced. Christians are attacked in the streets by you miscreants on a daily basis.
    And then theirs the unfair levels of taxation imposed upon those who make more than the lazy bum liberals who want hand outs. That is abuse by simple means of taking advantage and having the government forcefully take their money from them.
    YOU ARE WRONG.

    Now prove me wrong or you will simply be considered the looser in this argument.

  17. gaylea says:

    Um… if I may. I am a woman and I despise feminists of today. They do not speak for me! They are now more about hating men than they are about women’s rights. There isn’t a squeak out of any of them about the abuses women take at the hands of radical Muslims! When they stand up for all women and quit bashing men then maybe I’ll change my mind, but right now I despise them! They also deride those of us who chose to stay home and raise our children. I believe most of them have no problem with abortion, and the tried their best to crucify Sarah Palin, and did a good job of it, thanks to the liberal MSM. I have names for people such as they, but they aren’t fit to print!

    Mickey2, Sarah Palin may be for the rights of women, but all women, not just some like NOW is. She might join NOW if her life depended on it, but that’s probably what it would take. I agree with the remainder of your comment. Christians are abused all the time and their churches are defaced. I also see it as abuse that I will have to pay taxes this year to help people kill babies, and now since Obama signed that danged bill on Friday to allow abortions abroad, I will be helping to kill babies overseas too. As far as I’m concerned, as a conservative Christian who knows that abortion is murder and that partial-birth abortion is just a nice name for sticking a suction hose in a hole in a baby who is half-in and half-out of it’s mother and sucking it’s brains out, when we pay our taxes this year we will have blood on our hands.

    Jersey says in one of his rants here that “…we who are claiming to be under duress like the Christians in America, the NRA, the extremely cheap and wealthy… BWAAAHAAAHAAAHAAA! That’s the most moronic comment I’ve ever heard. A liberal ranting about conservatives being cheap and wealthy! It’s a proven fact that conservatives have given more to charity than liberals. “Although liberal families’ incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227)” That quote comes from here:
    http://digg.com/politics/Conservatives_Give_More_to_Charity_Than_Liberals

    Personally, I enjoy helping others and giving. I simply want to be the one to decide which charities I give to and who I help with the money I earned without any help from anyone other than my husband. I prefer not to help abortionists murder babies but thanks to the libs I will now have blood on my hands. It stinks!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.