Self-loathing liberal Jew (tired of that phrase being redundant, but it is) Debbie Wasserman-Schultz has just been selected to head the Downright Nasty Committee, formerly known as the Democratic National Committee.
She was not elected to the post. She was appointed by President Obama. It is vital to understand why.
Ms. Wasserman-Schultz has two characteristics that make her a perfect fit for the job.
Her main criteria is that she is a nasty, hateful woman. She is the epitome of an ideological bigot. She does not merely disagree with conservatives. She despises them.
Her first vile comment came only moments after getting the DNC job. She said that if the GOP budget were to pass, 70,000 seniors would die.
That’s right, supporting Republicans means murdering seniors. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz is another one of those “enlightened” and “tolerant” liberals who savages Republicans and conservatives in the way conservatives go after Al Qaeda. After all, until Islamofascists publicly threaten to overturn Roe vs Wade, Ms. Wasserman-Schultz is not bothered by them.
Ms. Wasserman-Schultz is hate speech personified. Picture what would happen if former Florida Congressman Robert Wexler mated with former DNC Chair Howard Dean. The result would be an angry, hysterical screaming leftist. Better yet, picture Barney Frank wedding Joy Behar and reproducing.
(Forget sexual orientation. This union would explain the hair. Liberals love to attack conservative women for their fashion sense, so the shaggy mane that is Miss Lassie Man-Schultz or Mane-Schultz is fair game.)
When Howard Dean left, Tim Kaine took over the DNC. Kaine is a “normal” Democrat. He is not a raving lunatic. He decided to run for the open Virginia Senate seat vacated when Jim Webb was too gutless and cowardly to face George Allen in a rematch.
The Democratic Party winning in 2006 had nothing to do with Howard Dean. He was banished from television after numerous gaffes. Rahm Emanuel was the brains behind the victory, recruiting sane (non-liberal) moderate to conservative Democrats. The Democratic Party losses in 2010 had nothing to do with Tim Kaine. Obama and the Pelosiraptor ruined Emanuel’s attempt to move the left to the center. Yet the message the Democrats received based on 2006 and 2010 was that blind irrational hatred works. Civility does not.
Ms. Lassie Mane Schultz is a dog of an individual cut from the cloth of the hateful wing of the Democratic Party. This is what the left wants.
Yet there is one other element to Ms. Schultz that makes her a perfect choice for Barack Obama.
Ms. Wasserman-Schultz is a left-wing self-hating Jew.
She is the equivalent of a human shield. By having a Jewish last name, she gives Obama cover to bash Jews and Israel with reckless abandon. With Rahm Emanuel now the dictator for life in Chicago, Mr. Obama needs a token Jew to spout the Palesimian point of view.
Ms. Wasserman-Schultz is a staunch support of J-Street, a hard left Arab funded organization that pretends to be Pro-Israel. Non-Arab funding comes from George Soros, the most powerful Jewish Nazi romanticizer on Earth.
With the Palesimians about to send a flotilla on May 15th (the anniversary of the “Nakbah,” which means “mistake” in referring to the creation of Israel) to provoke Israel, Barack Obama will be able to attack Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for defending his own nation. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz will immediately fall into line behind him to give the party a phony pro-Israel blanket in time for the election.
Put Code Pink and their anti-Semitism in the room with executives from the Republican Jewish Coalition. Would Ms. Wasserman-Schultz even consider the anti-Semite Code Pinkos as the bad guys?
Not a chance.
Between attacking Republicans and Israel, Ms. Wasserman-Schultz is everything Barack Obama could possibly want in a party spokesperson.
Congratulations Democrats. The Downright Nasty Committee has their Jew shrew.
Just don’t tell ever preach to a single conservative Republican about civility.
Civility is now officially dead in the Democratic Party. They chose anger and rage over dialogue and reasonable behavior.
They found the perfect spokesperson who represents them accurately.
That does not say much for Ms. Wasserman-Schultz, but it says much worse about what has become of the party she now represents.
eric
That is why I started voting as an Independent several years ago, ( voted for Bush and McCain in the general elections).
I also voted for Meg Whitman over Brown who now has issued
a fait di compli. Either you vote to extend the taxes, or face
severe cuts in services. Wowowowo.
Hey Brown, you want to stablize California, bring back taxes
on property (and businesses). Or, have a residency requirment
of 2 years for anyone moving here to get benefits. I mean,
let them move to Texas or the Midwest. On the other hand,
why would anyone want to move to the Midwest?
I am a very proud US born Jew, who became a Zionist at age 13.
Unlike many of my classmates in Hebrew school (after regular school),
I remained a few years upon reciting a portion of the Torah at my bar mitsvah. In fact, I enjoyed Hebrew school..learning to read Hebrew from the prayer book, singing the many songs, and knowing something of my people’s history. In regular school, I was one of the many Jewish classmates. We became obviousw at the high holy days when we took a vacation..and at Christmas/Easter holidays when our enthusiams was
tepid.
But I did not experience any over anti-Semitism, knowing full well
it was there. Our Christians were good Christians.
30% of US Jews voted for the Republican candidate last Nov.
20% voted Republican 2 years prior. Thats a good increase, but
still far from enough.
I want to witness at least 50% voting for anyone who is not a Demcrat,
in 2 years.
A few interesting stats: Arabs/Muslims, if asked, will say their vote
is split. The are smarter than we Jews. They win either way.
But Democrats have Jews in their pockets. We finance most of their campaigns. We have a strong presence in the Congress and on the
Supreme Court. We vote wedge issues..like aboritiion, ga rights,
Tikkun Olam ( reparing the USA). We do not vote our own interests.
We have gelt (money) liek rich Protestants, but vote like poor Puerto
Ricans, as the saying goes.
Dont ask me why our attitude about wedge issues? Who cares?
We are losing 30,000 year to other faiths, assimilation and intermarriage.
A stat to prove the above: 2m Jews in NYCity 50 years ago, now 700000. many from abroad. 1.7m Jews in NYState out of 19m people.
In California there are 40m people 700,000 Jews.
Both states are very blue and are the flagship ends of the country
s democratic base.
This choice by Obama is outllandish. She favors J St. That says a lot about her and Obama. I guess now that Rahm is gone..he can get away with it.
Most Jews will not question his decision..but act like WW2 Jews, going to their slaughter w/o nary a wimper. (Hey Jews, ever here of 22s?)/
JStreet believes that we should have dialogue with Israel’s avowed enemies, and support the 67 cease fire lines as the final borders, with East Jerusalem becoming part of Palestine. They wanted the US to vote yes on making construction and settlements illegal at the UN.
In other words, they think Iran will reform and accept the Holcaust as a proven fact (6m bodies cremated and buried bodies doesnt suffice).
They believe that reversing 7 wars is what this conflict is about.
I don’t.
Every Jew in that group had they lived in the Ukraine or Poland or Germany during WW2, woudl today be lamp shades. They just
dont get it.
Oh that Obama is cute and sly.
Yet we Jews will continue to support him.
I ask, will we ever learn? How many Fogel families will have their
necks cut before we wake up? How many Russian missles (korant)
wll be fired at religious school buses by Hamas thugs before we
undetstand what is going on?
Funny, but I havent heard anything from Obama regarding the
Arab Leagues request to shoot down Jewish piloted jets flying over Gaza?
Funny! I can see it now, the IAF duking it out with Belgium or France.
Wowowo.
Like I’ve said before;
Liberal Jews makes as much sense as the Pope the performing abortions.
The people they embrace would kill all angry black gay Jews first
When did Wasserman-Shultz say “that if the GOP budget were to pass, 70,000 seniors would die?” I can’t find it.
JMJ
“SCHULTZ: We see a clear attempt for the government to back out of its commitment to seniors. As a result, many seniors in America will be forced into poverty, and worse, some seniors will end up dying because they are forced to put off getting that pain checked out due to huge out-of-pocket costs that will skyrocket for them. This Republican path to poverty is just wrong.”
70,000 is how many would supposedly be subjected to Ryans plan.
Does it matter if its 7 or 70,000 ?
Its all BS fear mongering.
Oh, and school kids will starve too
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/03/31/shah_gop_budget_would_kill_70000_children
‘As Congress struggles to negotiate a budget deal to keep the government running, the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) told lawmakers Wednesday that the GOP version of the budget bill would result in the deaths of at least 70,000 children who depend on American food and health assistance around the world. ”
Thats 140,000 less carbon footprints Jersey.
You should rejoice !
Again, when did she say 70,000 seniors would die because of the Ryan plan?
JMJ
Try reading for context.
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/tygrrrr-express/2011/apr/8/if-government-shuts-down-forest/
“If a government shuts down at midnight and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz predicts the death of 70,000 seniors, how many minutes have to go by before this becomes another leftist prediction fiction?
With the Shutdown on the horizon, life will go on.
With the Shutdown on the horizon, life will go on.
If heaven forbid a tornado hits at 12:03am and kills 1,000 people, does this mean that Wasserman-Schultz is now a Jewish prophet?”
She did say seniors would die.
The stats according to her rendition of Ryans plan is similar to the other link posted.
Grow up, even if she didnt say it shes stull full o crap because under Obamacare more than 70,000 would die.
I’ve seen her distort facts so many times its not funny
Eric may have crossed his wires.
But theres enough references to Wasserman and the left towing Pelosis lines of crap from 6 million starving seniors to 70,000 starving kids all because of Ryan.
http://www.younggunscoalition.com/index.php/liberty-cavalier/no-nancy-seniors-wont-die-because-of-limited-government/
http://www.google.com/search?q=Wasserman+if+the+GOP+budget+were+to+pass%2C+70000+seniors+would+die.+.&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
70,000 sure seems to be a popular number with moonbats