November hate mail

After plenty of traveling, there is not always time for fresh analysis of issues. So when in doubt, my critics are still the imbecilic gift that keeps on giving. Here is a small slice of my November hate mail. Forgive the strong language. I do not curse in my columns but my critics are uncivilized animals with no regard for decency standards.

Nutcase
[email protected]

Re: The savage lynching of Herman Cain

Not only are you making an ass out of yourself and your paper, you are helping in removing millions of women from the GOP column. Your calling this a lynching is sick, sir, and you need serious help. You are a whining, sick, conservative, nutcase and you have no business on a newspaper website, let along near a serious discussion.

You have no idea the kind of rage you are spawning toward YOU and your sick, sad, pathetic ditto heads on the right.

Shame on you, ou sick fck.

Analysis: GOP women love me. The commenter seems to hate all conservatives. I do not think I am spawning his rage. He seemed to have it before I ever wrote a column.

grimwomyn
[email protected]

The only violence at OWS has been committed by the police. You are not a journalist, you are a disappointment as a media "professional."

Analysis: Feminist lunatics began spelling women as womyn with a y so that it would not contain the word men. I wish the police would beat the daylights out of any feminist caught spelling an entire gender as womyn. At the very least bring in Joe “Lean on me” Clark with his baseball bat.

razo
[email protected]

Understood. Your are on their payroll. Bad article.

Analysis: I defend Wall Street so apparently I am on their payroll. Perhaps I could accuse the commenter of being on the OWS payroll but that would imply that anybody in the OWS movement ha a job, collects a paycheck, or contributes in any way to society in a positive manner.

Yes, I admit it, I (e)mailed it in today. I promise to do better in the future. As for my critics, there is no hope. Say it with me everyone.

These are liberals. This is how they behave.

I also got blistered on a sports column pointing out that Joe Paterno should not have been fired. He did plenty of good things in 61 years, and one serious error in judgment should not invalidate all of that. Yet people let emotions get in the way of logical reasoning. Anyone defending Paterno was attacked as evil themselves. I am used to it.

Joe Bush Sr
[email protected]
Would you be so sympathetic to this coach if this victim was your child or a member of your
family? Paterno had to know that this person was raping preteen boys before he was infomed
what had been observed at the time and doing that for many years that followed? How in hell
could he condone his and let this animal do as he wanted with children. How could Paterno
work with him on a daily basis knowing this for years, don't he have (not the animal)
a sense of right or wrong or a smidgen of conscience. They always blame the heathen or
ungodly for this type of behavior (like Dahmer, Manson, Bundy, Gein, Gasy-just to name a
very few) but it is always those among you and when you condone this, you are just as
guilty and should be liable for this atrocity.

No, I am not guilty of sexually violating young boys just because I believe we should respect the rule of law. The Attorney General did not prosecute Coach Paterno. I have no idea if the writer is a liberal but liberals love invalidating the law when they do not agree with the results. Sadly too many of these people own keyboards and send me hate mail. They deserve sympathy if they have nothing better to do with their time.

eric aka the Tygrrrr Express

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.