In 2005, WMD were found. Yes, you read that correctly. It was quickly
considered a nonstarter as a news story because then the "Bush lied"
crowd would have been revealed for the horrendous human beings that
they are. The amount found was very small in nature, but then again,
there is never just one cockroach. While other republicans choose to
apologize for honest mistakes, at which point liberals respond by
calling us liars, I prefer the battering ram approach. I wrote the
words below two years ago. My feelings are unchanged. Again, keep in
mind. We did find WMD. In 2005.
Dear Liberals,
Now that WMD have been found, you have to begin the tortured process of
explaining why this is not significant, and why even though you are
repeatedly wrong about everything that matters in this world, people
should still listen to you. Here are some messages that are as harsh as
they are accurate. We did not go to war because of WMD. We went to war
because Saddam Hussein was a sh*thead who needed to be removed. As for
why we do not remove every worldwide sh*thead...give us time...we should.
Liberal politicians used WMD as an excuse because they desperately needed
to vote yes to go to war to avoid getting shellacked in the 2002
elections.Liberals wanted badly to be against the war but were afraid
that after 9/11, that was an untenable political position. Therefore, you
created a phantom issue because you did not have the guts to vote your
convictions. You knew you were wrong, and you needed an out.
Saddam had WMD. We found them. There are plenty more. If you do not
believe they are dangerous, allow yourself to be trapped in a room with
them. If you are scared to do so...welcome to the real world.
Bush did not lie. Bush is not evil. Bush did not steal the election. You
lost the 2000 AND 2004 elections because:
1) Elderly Gore voters could not read a ballot. Euthanasia would solve
this problem. I have no sympathy for people who are too careless to spend
time reviewing a decision as serious as a presidential vote.
2) Move on.org and its 2 million "Deaniacs" do not represent the 268
million people who do not belong to your organization. Most people look
at you and want you to put on a clean shirt, and stop hiring college
students who resemble Charles Manson in terms of complexion and rage.
3) Liberals are unlikeable. McGovern, Dukakis, Gore, Kerry...Bill Clinton
got elected by running as far away from you as possible. Americans are
optimistic, can-do people. The sky is not falling. America is good.
Abu Gharaib was nothing...Guantanamo Bay is insignificant. Haditha is
irrelevant. Daniel Pearl is the way of life of our enemies. Our
aberrations are their way of life. The USA are the good guys . The
terrorists are the bad guys. Use the passion you have towards President
Bush and direct it at Osama, Zarqawi, Saddam, the Mullahs, etc...
You stand for nothing. You support the troops but despise the mission
that they support.Have the guts to either say you do not support the
troops...or better yet support them and admit the cause they have been
fighting for has been right all along.
Lastly, your heroes are worthless:
Dan Rather--You did a lousy job. You went from first to last in the
ratings, and you were fired based on performance...Period. I can type up a
document right now claiming you smoke crack. You might say that is false,
but based on your bizarre behavior,my document would be fake but accurate.
NY Times--Jayson Blair...'nuff said.
George Soros--You are a convicted insider trader who made his money
destroying the economies and currencies of 3rd world nations. You have
profited not by merely feeding off of human misery, but by causing it.
Barbra Streisand...You are a nasty shrewish woman who is abusive to
your personal assistants.
Ted Kennedy--Who was driving the car? You lied, a woman died.
Robert Byrd--Joining the KKK is not a mistake...it is a disgusting act
of bad moral character.
Cindy Sheehan--Your family is disgusted with you. You claim to be
speaking for your family, but they want you to shut up, come home, and
quit neglecting your loved ones. Your anti-semitism is just icing on
the cake.
College Professors who grew up in the 60s--Stop f*cking up our children.
Actions have consequences, and the AIDS and drug crises we face in the
USA today are a direct result of your irresponsibility. You should not
have the right to teach until you learn. Kids will continue to not know
anything useful in life when they are being taught by people who don't
know anything.
John Murtha--I have the right to disagree with you without you claiming
that your patriotism is being attacked. My right to dissent is as valid
as yours. You are an American hero who is wrong on this issue. I honor
your service then, and I fiercely disagree with your positions now. Your
heroism does not stop you from being completely wrong.
Nancy Pelosi--San Francisco does not represent America. Even democrats
don't want to hold their convention in your city ever again.
Howard Dean--You could not even win the nomination in primaries dominated
by people who agreed with you. When liberals are frightened of you, you
are scary.
Liberal Voters---You are cowards. You desperately wanted to vote for
Howard Dean,but knew he could not win. You supported an uninspiring
candidate who believed nothing rather than support a candidate who
actually represented your beliefs. You knew the American people as a
whole continue to say you are wrong, so your options are losing
presidential elections or sacrificing your principlas to win an election,
knowing you will not be able to govern.
If liberals want to know why they are so detested socially and
electorally, I can offer a cure...in 3 words...
SSSSTTTOOOOOPPPPPP BBBBEEEEIIINNNNNGGGGG WWWWWRRRRROOOONNNGGGGG!!!!!!!
Man that felt good to get off my chest. I would knock sense into them,
but I wish not to scuff my fingernails.
Now if only conservatives would start fighting back. They could force
liberals to sit there as we tell them "We found WMD. Now sit down and be
quiet." This happened in 2005.
Thank you and goodnight...from the right...from someone who IS right.
eric
This entry was posted on Saturday, May 12th, 2007 at 2:34 am and is filed under POLITICS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
What specific WMD were found?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Love your style!! Oh. Wait. Dear Brian…you are kidding, right? Were you asleep or do you NOT know how to research anything?
The Deaniacs even said that the WMDs were “old”. Hello? Old or new, what’s the diff? They certainly were NOT totally inert.
Keep up the good work blacktygrrr!!
blacktygrrr…can I “steal” the above? My readers would absolutely love this stuff!!
All credit to you, naturally.
Brian, what about 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents
17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas)
Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and “conventional” sarin gas, assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency.
Since that isn’t good enough for most liberals, consider something else. Since the left strongly believes Bush to be such a sneaky, underhanded, diabolical liar, why wouldn’t he just continue the lie and plant what would be needed to show the world?
Some claim the ied that was exploded there with sarin gas was within a very limited area. All Chemical weapons disperse in limited areas, depending on the size of the weapon and dissapate into the air in a given time. That is why the sarin gas released in Tokyo was inside of a subway, to keep it contained for maximum effect.
For your reading pleasure: http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol1_rsi-06.htm
I had the pleasure of reading this from Mr. Waters link:
Sorting Out Whether Iraq Had WMD Before Operation Iraqi Freedom
ISG has not found evidence that Saddam Husayn possessed WMD stocks in 2003, but the available evidence from its investigation—including detainee interviews and document exploitation—leaves open the possibility that some weapons existed in Iraq although not of a militarily significant capability. Several senior officers asserted that if Saddam had WMD available when the 2003 war began, he would have used them to avoid being overrun by Coalition forces.
[…] GREAT STUFF!! I have been reading posts from this location and it is great stuff. I have asked permission to “steal” a particular post and it was granted. I will highlight a few statements. Send this blogger well-wishes. I have sent an invitation to join us at TVC. Behold: […]