Fresh from a ton of parties on the second night of Hanukkah, I now need to prepare for partying on the third night. I love this holiday. Since I do not drink alcohol, smoke tobacco, or do drugs, I will stick with my vice of choice…women.
Sticking with women, one of the reasons Judaism is seen as “weak” by outsiders, and why Jewish men are seen as “momma’s boys,” is because our religion emasculates men. Of course we call it “celebrating women,” but it is out and out emasculation of men. We have holidays specifically dedicated to the power of women.
That is another reason to love Hanukkah. It is pure male testosterone. We came, we saw, and we conquered. We kicked some rumpus. Pure military force allowed the Maccabees to just smack around the enemy like they were women in need of a good backside slap.
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/man_finally_put_in_charge_of
For those of you wondering why out of nowhere I am deliberately advocating the denigration of an entire gender, just relax, the twist is coming any sentence now.
Ever since the feminist mistake, women have been up in arms looking for ways to exact vengeance on the male gender. It was supposed to be about the right to vote, and equal work for equal pay. Now it is about attempting to destroy men. Unfortunately for the radical feminists (redundant, I know), they are cannibals. They eat their own. They betray each other. They do more to commit violence against their fellow females than most men ever could.
Therefore, in the spirit of Hanukkah, I will describe eight situations where it is perfectly acceptable to abuse women physically, sexually, or psychologically, one for each night. You can take these women and paddle their backsides, and there will be no consequences, unless gratification is a consequence. Do not worry about the feminists getting angry, which is how they normally go through life. They will allow this abuse to happen. So for those of you out there looking to abuse women, here are the eight acceptable situations.
1) The male sexual predator has to be politically liberal. Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton have carte blanche to abuse women. If the woman ends up dead, it is acceptable, provided that the abuser is pro-choice on abortion. Of course they will be pro-choice, because that way they can be irresponsible and be able to get rid of the evidence. If abortion is not the way to get rid of the evidence, driving over a bridge is plan b. Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones…sorry ladies. The feminists do not care. Anita Hill? No evidence required. Republicans do not get this exemption, even if they are pro-choice. Sorry Bob Packwood.
In fact, the NOW announced that Bill Clinton should be praised because after he tried to get lewd with Kathleen Willey, he did not try a second time. He took no for an answer. Therefore, every man in America gets one free chance to cop a feel.
2) The woman can be a beauty pageant contestant. They are fair game for being violated. Feminists hate beauty queens, due to obvious jealousy. Angry women have more wrinkle lines. Desiree Washington alleged rape against Mike Tyson, and I do not recall any feminist groundswell.
3) The woman must be politically conservative. Radio djs recently advocated raping Laura Bush and Condoleeza Rice. Stone cold silence. I can advocate taking a paddle to Hillary’s badonkadonk and believe you me the secret service will have something to say about it as soon as they find out what a badonkadonk is.
4) Poor and/or ugly women are not given the same protection as attractive women, provided the women are not too attractive as to be in a beauty pageant. If a woman is considered hideously ugly, a man can abuse her because nobody would believe that he would be interested anyway. If the man is considered handsome, then the case is closed. There is no way Bill Clinton could have raped Juanita Broderick. He is considered pleasing to look at, while she is not.
5) Muslim women can and should be beaten as often as possible. From Detroit to Dubai, from Afghanistan to Zambia, the feminists condone the brutal beating of Muslim women. The feminists really struggle with this one, because they want to be against male violence towards women, but those who abuse the Koran for their own evil purposes also tend to hate Republicans, especially George W. Bush. Besides, if they succeed in destroying America, and we become part of the Caliphate, there will be no Republicans left. If some women get beaten in the process, such collateral damage is part of a greater good.
6) Non-Muslim women in Muslim nations are entitled to forty lashes at a minimum. Any woman that allows a teddy bear to be named Mohammed should know better. The feminists of America will not speak up to save her. They will treat her as if she smoked tobacco or caused global warming. To get an exemption, one has to submit to Islam and denounce all Republicans, primarily George W. Bush. This how Nancy the Pelosiraptor escaped her lashes. She wore a Burkha, sipped Tea with Assad, and denounced the tyranny of an American President.
7) Prostitutes can be beaten. Feminists will go insane when some radio shock jock refers to women as “nappy headed hos.” Some feminists will even criticize music that refers to women as b*tches and hos. Ironically, these same feminists will not stick up for actual hos getting pimp slapped by…well, pimps, I guess. It could be because prostitutes tend to be attractive, and feminists despise women who succeed by being pretty and offering sexuality, whether they be strippers, call girls, etc. Besides, many women have lost their men to these women. Once Hugh Grant cheated on Elizabeth Hurley, aka proof that perfection exists, no woman was safe anywhere.
Before going further, all people are prostitutes. I am a corporate slut. I will not compromise my principles, unless there is money in it for me. I sold out to the establishment for money, and got a decent haircut. The old joke is quite true. A man asks a woman if she will sleep with him for a million dollars, and she says that she would. The man then asks if she would for $10. She responds that she is not a hooker. The man explains to her that, “we’ve already established that you’re a hooker, now we’re just negotiating the price.”
8.) Women can be beaten in the movies. After all, the feminists cannot advance their agenda unless society is convinced that every white, conservative investment banker in the movies is busy sexually violating minority women in between drinking oil flavored martinis at lunch and chopping down trees for sport. After all, if both genders actually felt life was getting better between them, the feminists would have no power. They are the angry, white liberal versions of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Exacerbating hostility between the genders allows these feminists to have something to do. Most women in Hollywood are liberals, but since Hollywood is about acting, the more liberal the woman on the screen, the more oppressed she is. Only in real life are liberal women protected.
I want to make it clear that I support women receiving equal pay for equal work. I also support women achieving full equality in society, because if the radical feminists ever do shut up, men and women will be better off. We will not have to listen to women comparing marriage to slavery while secretly praying for flowers and a wedding ring from a strong, smart Adonis who will turn them into paddle Queens.
It is very important that men do not try to physically or sexually abuse women who are politically liberal, the correct amount of attractiveness, or the wrong religion or ethnicity. For those who are still unclear which women are fair game and which women are off limits, Barbara Boxer’s office will be publishing a list of the women she has defended and ignored over the last three decades. The list will be available in Spanish, Braille, and Ebonics. Coincidentally, Ms. Boxer herself is the first woman in the protected column, meaning that conservative Republican men should not even think about spanking her liberal hide.
The world now knows the eight categories of acceptable abuse of womyn, one for each night of Hanukkah. May the men of this world enjoy this testosterone driven holiday, and as for the women of America, I suggest you join a protected group very soon.
Ok, off to find my tennis racket and go visit a certain Republican Jewish brunette. Don’t worry sweetie, I will bring some ointment for you after I am done. You may object to this, but you do not have a say. The feminists will not defend you, since your beliefs justify my misogyny.
Actually, I have no desire to hurt anyone, although I would not mind the radical feminists having their mouths ductaped while I am trying to watch football. They could voluntarily shut up until the commercials, but that has never happened.
The bottom line is either all women should get abused, or none of them should get abused. I prefer none of them get abused. I also prefer to live in a world where feminists actually stop promoting a liberal agenda, and start fighting for all women to be treated with respect. Men and women would both benefit from this.
eric
Black tygrrr wrote;
“The bottom line is either all women should get abused, or none of them should get abused.
I’m sorry. But I still would love to tie Rosie down to a chair in a room full of yoddles, and melting steel.
I’m outraged!
(Just as a point of curiosity, can anyone be inraged?)
[…] of Women is OK? Eric over at Black Tygrrrrr thinks so, and he’s got some damn fine examples of when it’s OK and when it’s […]
There are three reasons conservatives do not embrace feminism and it’s myriad ideologies – they are insecure, they are unable to empathize with others, and they don’t understand what feminism is.
Insecurity is a driving force in conservative ideology, and being a patriarchal assuasion, the security of masculinity plays a major role in it’s doctrinal beliefs. That’s why conservatives hate independent, educated women who do not toe their line more than men of the same bent. That’s why conservatives hate abortion rights as they free women to make choices with their lives free of the dictates of men. That’s why conservatives look at women as objects while liberals apologize for that mistake if they make it.
But for the conservative male to understand the women’s rights movement they need something that can herlp them to empathize with their plight: imagination. Unfortunately, that’s something all conservatives, by definition lack. That’s why they were “surprised” by 9/11 and still don’t understand why it happened, thus reacting to it in all the wrong ways. That’s why there are so few conservative artists, actors, writers, journalists, performers, musicians and the like. These endeavors require imagination and a willingness to question and critique the status qou. Conservatism allows for no such thought. It is the ideology of stagnation, endlessly living in an imaginary past, stifling any change that comes their way. Feminism was change, and the conservatives just can’t abide it. Change frightens them.
I, for one, consider myself a feminist of the “reformed-Paglia” variety. There’s the early-Paglia feminists, the Ferdandians, the first, second and third wavers, the liberals, the libertarians, the socialists, and the posts – there are all sorts of feminisms. It is not a monthematic block of utterly like-minded movementarians, and that is perhaps the most fundamental misunderstanding conservatives have with feminism, and it makes them look (I’m sorry but…) stupid. Conservatives will never make ideological inroads with the feminist movement as long as they show such ignorance of the very movement, it’s causes and concerns, it’s personalities and dynamics. Almost everything said in this post shows a complete and total lack of knowledge of feminism. When you try to argue from a point of complete ignorance, your argument inevitably falls flat on it’s face.
Perhaps you should read a little about and from the movement before you cast aspersions onto it. I too have arguments regarding feminism, but I actually know of which I speak.
JMJ
“The bottom line is either all women should get abused, or none of them should get abused. I prefer none of them get abused.”
No, the bottom line is that none of them should get abused. Period. End of story.
Jersey is pretty much right on in his analysis, but I would also add that just as there are many different types of feminists, there are also many different types of liberals and many different types of conservatives, so when someone makes claims that “liberals believe this …” or “conservatives believe that …” it is usually a red flag that, whatever the point of discussion is, it will be rather superficial and largely inaccurate.
Eric, I’m sure there are a whole lot of conservatives who would be appalled at what you just said.
Moreover, you saw the other day how your satirical comments about Jesse Jackson filing a lawsuit over chess got picked up by Google, which names your blog and quotes you saying “Jesse Jackson has a pending lawsuit against the World Chess Federation because chess is a racist game created by colonial occupiers. …” If you want to have credibility as a serious blogger, you have to watch what you say and how you say it.
Uh oh, here come the sensitivity police, hide your humor.
Not that they would want any for themselves.
Gee, micky2, I thought you were the one with no sense of humor. My obviously funny comment to you the other day about Bill O’Reilly not being able to hold a job, you said you needed a a happy face smile :)
JMJ wrote;
“I, for one, consider myself a feminist of the “reformed-Paglia” variety. There’s the early-Paglia feminists, the Ferdandians, the first, second and third wavers, the liberals, the libertarians, the socialists, and the posts – there are all sorts of feminisms. It is not a monthematic block of utterly like-minded movementarians, and that is perhaps the most fundamental misunderstanding conservatives have with feminism”
Man ! Now we know where anti discrimination legislation begins, sheez.
How many freeking factions of anything do we need ?
Maybe we should start a mens movement . And break it up into as many fractions as we can , starting with skin color and work our way down to sub concious gays.
Because before you know it, guys like Jersey will be running around with all our nuts in a bucket.
Eventually were going to have to do something about all the discrimination cast on males via the left, right ?
Look, Eric’s post was spot-on. He highlighted the overall contradictions in the feminist movement that overlooks the poor treatment of women by Islam, Bil Clinton, and attractive, popular men and revels in the humiliation and abuse heaped upon women of different political identities.
If you really think he’s advocating the abuse of women, you should really turn on your satire engine.
I have always enjoyed Camille Paglia…now- N.O.W., who appears to be an arm of the Hillary Clinton campaign machine, that is another story.
Eric, I wanted to let you know, I was doing a little guest blogging over here. Yes I mention Hillary but I am not a man so I don’t call it an obsession, I call it a deep seated resentment BIG GRIN. I like Marty Davis, chickaboomer is fun.
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2007/12/rfd-tv-beats-msnbc-imus-ratings.html
Very admirable, and well said doc. Unfortunatly just saying the word “women” is enough to get these oversensative zealots all lit up.
What I find amusing is that guys like myself are perceived by the left as “insecure with myself” when I dont take notice of every little obscurity in some poor slobs life who has no identity.
But these guys whom I’ll call “the ladies man” are about as pu**y whipped as I’ve ever seen.
I added the following link to my column today just now.
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/man_finally_put_in_charge_of
The headline alone cracked me up, and the timing could not have been more perfect.
Micky,
“How many freeking factions of anything do we need ?”
I don;t know. Whatever amount, I suppose. What does it mattter?
“Maybe we should start a mens movement .”
Micky, you have no idea how funny – and redunant – a comment that is!
The various types in the women’s movemnet reflect various views about what the problems are and what – or what not – to do about them. These are reflections of a dynamic movement – and that’s a good thing. We should embrace diversity of ideas, not walk in lock step like a bunch of lemmings.
JMJ
eric said, “I added the following link to my column today just now.
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/man_finally_put_in_charge_of
The headline alone cracked me up, and the timing could not have been more perfect.”
Loved it! The Onion is one of my all-time favorite sites. Thanks, eric …
This article would have been better not written/posted.
JMJ wrote;
“We should embrace diversity of ideas, not walk in lock step like a bunch of lemmings.”
Theres embracment of the unique, yes. But I am sick to death of all these little special interest groups that want special interest in themselves.
My God, I’ve even seen you struggling to put a label on you political calling and title.
This all has to stop somewhere or its going to get to a point where we have to walk around with a PC dictionary to know what the hell to call everyone we meet.
And that in itself would be very subjective to claims of bigotry everytime you refer to some one in the wrong title or characterization.
Even my mother the moonbat say we are all very special, but not that different.
JMJ wrote;
“Micky, you have no idea how funny – and redunant – a comment that is!”
Jersey, I am sick and tired of being hunted , hounded and pursued by women who see me as nothing but a sex object. Even you , who claim to be a feminist wont leave me alone.
JMJ wrote;
“The various types in the women’s movemnet reflect various views about what the problems are and what – or what not – to do about them. These are reflections of a dynamic movement – and that’s a good thing. We should embrace diversity of ideas, not walk in lock step like a bunch of lemmings.”
Like the ones following the Goracle ?
“…I am sick to death of all these little special interest groups that want special interest in themselves.”
So what? Are you a socialist now? I though self-interest was the foundation of a free society and free markets? Of course people act in their self-interest. It’s when they hurt someone else to satisfy their self-interest tat the government steps in. But how does the women’s movement hurt you? Why would it even concern you? It really shouldn’t matter to you all, aside from caring about the interests of the women in your life. Do you want your mother to be sexually harrassed? Of course not! Do you want your sister to earn less pay as a man for doing the same job just because she’s a woman? Of course not? Do you want your daughter to be tracked in school into an unrewarding carreer just because she’s a girl? Of course not!
Get with the program, man!
JMJ
I got your program, right here.
These are the women in my life before I met my wife.
http://micky2.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/wanna-know-how-it-feels-when-your-friends-turn-there-backs-on-you/#respond
JMJ asked;
“But how does the women’s movement hurt you? ”
Its not just a “womens movement” its called a feminist movement. And it has been implemented in our schools. It has at some point gone past supporting womens rights to the point that it is being presented to kids in school.
Just being about womens rights or “liberation as it originally was called is now a lie.
The truth, however, is that boys, not girls, display the signs of educational and social disadvantage, and the cause of this turns out to be a combination of feminist reeducation programs and general “progressive” educational theory.
The feminist educational project is quite openly one of indoctrination and imposition, in which the wishes of the subjects, whether boys or girls, and irrelevant or even dangerous. Privacy is invaded because the radical feminist project, like all totalitarian projects, allows no privacy. The fundamental incongruity between feminism and “progressive” education is the contradiction between the principle of the latter that children should be allowed to grow and develop naturally, determined by their own autonomous impulses.
Even the propensity of boys to run and jump, let alone engage in rough-and-tumble play, is now suppressed in many schools, to the point of it becoming a movement to abolish recess — this at a time when health activists continue to lament the overweight and inactive lifestyles of American children. If sedentary and junk-food nourished children are to be denied free outdoor exercise, there must be some powerful reason for doing so.
The reason, indeed, is that the boys/men behave differently from the girls/women. This cannot be allowed.
This is why I think its a BS movement.
That was disturbing, Micky. All I saw was a bunch of dead links that said “Butts.” Oosh.
And I still have no idea what your problem is with the women’s movement.
JMJ
Hmmm, I’ll go see whats wrong. Too bad for you.
JMJ wrote;
“And I still have no idea what your problem is with the women’s movement.”
First of all, if you could read, its not just a “womans movement” It feminism.
And its being implemented to our kids in school, right now !
Read the article. I think you did and just cant refute it.
So you continue to act as if I made no valid poibnt or answerd your question, which I did.
I’ll try again, I wont even cross my fingers this time.
The fact of feminism is this. Feminists don’t advocate for rights half as much as they used to. The contemplation of violence against women plays no role in their considerations; if it did, they would display their love for genitals in the nations of the Middle East and Africa, where human rights violations tend to be more egregious than in the United States. But rights aren’t what they’re concerned with. All they’re concerned with is transforming American culture to better match their values; to do this, they must redefine their gender as one characterized by depraved perverts.
And play the sympathy card , only to further their agenda for undeserved treatment.
Okay ?
Depraved perverts? Really? So, it’s a cabal of depraved perverts. What? The Department of Deranged Perverts (the DDP?… hmmm… that sounds funny…)?
So, because we don’t mutilate women’s genitals in the West, we should rest on our laurels and women should just shut up and smile? “No more rights for you!,” shouted the Mascunazi! ;) (Oh, and by the way, you know that genetal mutilation doesn’t have it’s roots in Islam and is and has been practiced outside the religion for God knows how long, right?)
Do you conservatives really believe that by trotting out the relative conditions of others you can somehow convince a free market of ideas that it should just shut up and admit, “Well hey! At least we’re not ancient tribesmen!”???
You have to do better than that. You guys stand up for your rights. You shouldn’t complain when others do. Debate what they’re proclaiming, not that they’re proclaiming it.
JMJ
Here ya go, try again.
http://socialistsquirrel.com/archives/52#respond
JMJ wrote;
“So, because we don’t mutilate women’s genitals in the West, we should rest on our laurels and women should just shut up and smile?
Nobody said that, except you. And of course, once again , the point went right over your head.
You cannot refute my first answer that our kids are being affected by this in our schools, so you play stupid and say you still don’t see what my beef is when its pointed out in plain english.
Who cares whether female circumcisions and the like are practiced within the Islamic roots or on the moon. It is being done all over the world and is far greater an offense against women than anything going on here at home, but your feminist friends wont tell you that.
And I also referd to the human rights issue as well as mutilating genitals.
I can see where your head is at.
Female genital cutting is today mainly practiced in African countries. It is common in a band that stretches from Senegal in West Africa to Somalia on the East coast, as well as from Egypt, in the north to Tanzania in the south; see Map. It is also practiced by some groups in the Arabian peninsula.The countries where FGC is most prevalent are Somalia, followed by Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia, and Mali. Among ethnic Somali women, infibulation is traditional and nearly universal. Recent figures estimate that 90 precent of Egyptian women have undergone FGC. Egypt recently passed a law banning FGC.
Map: Estimated Prevalence of Female Genital Cutting (FGC) in Africa. Data based on uncertain estimates.Whilst FGC is widely practiced out in the open by Africans of all faiths, it is practiced in secrecy in some parts of the Middle East. In the Arabian peninsula, Sunna circumcision is usually performed, especially among Arabs (ethnic groups of African descent are more likely to prefer infibulation). The practice occurs particularly in northern Saudi Arabia, southern Jordan, and Iraq. In the Iraqi village of Hasira, a recent study found that 60 percent of the women and girls reported having had the procedure. Prior to the study, there had been no solid proof of the procedure’s prevalence. There is also circumstantial evidence to suggest that FGC is practiced in Syria, western Iran, and southern TurkeyIn Oman, a few communities still practice FGC; however, experts believe that the number of such cases is small and declining annually. In the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, it is practiced mainly among foreign workers from East Africa and the Nile Valley.
The practice can also be found among a few ethnic groups in South America and very rarely in India (Dawoodi Bohra community). In Indonesia, the practice is fairly common among the country’s Muslim women; however, in contrast to Africa, almost all are Type I or Type IV, the latter usually involving the symbolic pricking of blood release.
JMJ implied I was saying;
““Well hey! At least we’re not ancient tribesmen!”???
The cause has been beat into the ground since the sixties, and its old and tired.
Women are treated much better today than they ever where in the 50s and 60s. The movement at the time got good and deserved results. Now it has morphed into a whole other cause that has no relevance to womens rights as much as it imposes a lifestyle on others.
If I you are so worried about any womans rights that are substantially being violated in huge volumes , get on a plane and go to Africa and give them your well intentions, they really need it. You’ll do more good than opening or not opening a door for a lady in America.
This is the same debate as the other day with equal rights for minorities.
You want to be equal ? Get in line with me. The world has been just as unfair an discriminating to me for a host of reasons that I would never try to bring legislation to simply because I cant accept life on its terms.
I have passed the test but am not licensed as a substance abuse counselor.
But it still remains still, that to pass the test you must take a slew of courses ranging from Domestic violence prevention , sensitivities in the work place, domestic causes for depression.
I have become a big advocate for womens safety and rights at home and in public and have even participated in anti domestic abuse marchs.
But these wenchs and their followers have taken their cause to a level that has nothing to do with BASIC human rights, they want to change the country.
And dont tell me I have to anything better. At least I have supplied answers instead of saying the same damn thing over and over. You make no points of consequence. You only ask tirelessly predictable questions.
Which I answerd. If you dont like them, you know what you can do
Oh my god !
I cant believe I forgot to mention this.
This is not meant to impress you Jersey, by any strech of your imagination.
I am a liberal, feminists, uber progressive womans wet dream.
I am a stay at home dad. I DO EVERYTHING !
I do all the driving, all the cleaning, all the cooking, laundry, household maintenence, shopping, finances,take care of the pets, the yard, go to all the school meetings and functions, take care of the car, feed the homeless once a week, and am a volunteer at the salvation army detox and treatment center.
My wife actually ( I swear to god) gets her coffee in bed EVERY morning. And a short rub down every night.
She works hard 5 days a week and I make sure all her needs are always met, as they should be.
So if you think I’m some kinda womanizing A hole who doesnt appreciate women, you are wrong.
I am all for fair treatment of any person. But I will not have the government tell me how by trying to legislate decency, ethics and morality, it has and never will work.
I will not stand for my sons school to impose gender based initiatives on him, he learns just fine from his father how to treat a woman.
I from what I can recall, you to are a stay at home dad also.
Gee , are you turning right ?
JMJ wrote;
“Depraved perverts? Really? So, it’s a cabal of depraved perverts. What? The Department of Deranged Perverts (the DDP?… hmmm… that sounds funny…)?”
I think you are refering to the feminists when you said this ?
It certainly appears that you got it backwards, the reference goes as such;
“to do this, they must redefine their gender as one characterized by depraved perverts.”
I believe its the feminist that are charcterizing anyone who doesnt see it their way as depraved perverts.
12 oz. curls ?
Micky, you still have nothing. What EXACTLY is it about the women’s movement that bothers you? That they want respect? Equal pay for equal work? Protection from harrassment and abuse? What is it exactly that bothers you? All I’m hearing is that you want them to shut up because you’re tired of hearing it. Well, why don’t you just stop paying attention then? After all, you say you’re a homemaker (I sorta am now too). So what possible problem can you have? Look, we can debate the wide array of issues here, if you like – the ease of divorce and the collapse of the family, daycare, lowered wages, generational backsliding, Title 9, etc. But to say that you just want them to be quiet is just pathetic. Why don’t you shut up instead? Get it?
This is just another conservative non-issue. Keep keeping your eyes off the prize, men. See how far it gets you.
JMJ
I thought this was a pretty funny post.
And I think his issue is hypocrisy in the women’s movement, not its existence or vociferousness.
Obviously the context of the above post cannot, did not, or simply will not penetrate your thick skull.
Or you are just pretending the points I made dont exist. Like a little baby with his fingers in his ears screaming La La La La .
Stop the game, I answerd your questions numerous times and they make sense that you cant handle.
This is a classic view of the left, performed by Jersey McJones. As quoted below.
JMJ said;
” But to say that you just want them to be quiet is just pathetic. Why don’t you shut up instead?
Hmm, kinda sounds like the Goracle, doesnt it ? “There is no debate ! Now shut up !”
Look Jersey, you are the party that wants to be able to say whatever, whenever, wherever.
I feel that the feminist movement should shut up and go away. But instead you tell me to shut up ?
You have your nerve since I already clearly gave an example of why the feminist movement is not about womens rights anymore so much as it is about a host of issues that have little to do with equal rights for women.
Untill you can grow up and accept “FACT” and maybe learn to absorb what you read a little better , I would suggest that you be the one to take and oral hiatus.
You’re not getting what I’m saying, Micky.
JMJ
Yes , I get it.
But if I point out what I get you will just make up some other issue that you say I dont get.
Did you use to perform for Simple Minds ?
Iwas in line with women in the 60s protests as they burned their bras along with our draft cards. I get it.
Used to be called “Womens Lib” Now it had morphed into this huge octopussy eith its tentacles reaching into the work place (cant say pussy cat without getting sued)
I am quite aware of your simple request that women be treated equally, I get it.
You are painfully un aware of the fallout from such a movement , or you choose to let it take its course all the whike setting up a gauntlet of ridiculous terms and impositions on our society.
The straglers from the original womens movement are just a bunch of lonely witchs who probably got hustled by some guy in a back seat and are pissed off at every man on earth now.
Do me a favor, read what I posted so I dont have to keep refreshing your incredibly short memory.
How dare you say those vile, while perfectively legitimate and hilarious, things!
You forgot:
9: Be a woman. Women can beat other women to hell and back. I sure have.
10: Get in her face when she’s hormonal — make her hit you first.
That is one of the funniest columns on any site I have read for a while. Love the humor. From now on I will think of Eric as the Politically Correct Feminist.
Who needs hormones, it happens all the time.
When it does I read poetry to her.
Feminism was a secret scheme by misogynist men to get women to do more work and have more sex.
Third wave feminists generally consist of crazy people, such as the Queers Undermining Israeli Terrorism http://www.quitpalestine.org/
THE BOTTOM LINE: HILLARY IS IRRESPONSIBLE WITH POWER
Dear American Friend, http://www.1984ArkansasMotherOfTheYear.com
I have attached my “Hillary file” which is culled from the 205+ books and other media that I have on Hillary and Bill. The Clintons are thugs. On the campaign trail in 2007 Hillary and Bill are play acting as the loving, respectful couple – singing each other’s praises on stage and engaging in public affection as they troll for votes.
In order to understand Hillary and Bill, one must first understand the wildly dysfunctional Jerry Springer lifestyle they have lived for 36 years. Hillary has covered for Bill who not only has had HUNDREDS of women, but also perpetrated several rapes and vicious sexual assaults, often involving biting the lips of the women victims. In order to cover up this Jerry Springer chaos, Hillary has often used Sopranos tactics: a secret police and criminal intimidation tactics to harass, intimidate and terrify Bill’s sex victims and girlfriends.
WE’VE HAD ENOUGH “EXPERIENCE” WITH HILLARY;
CLINTON BLACK OPERATIONS MUST STOP
These tactics include the savage beating/almost murder of Gennifer Flower’s neighbor (Gary Johnson – 6/26/92), criminal harassment campaigns on Kathleen Willey (1997-98 car vandalism, stole or killed her cat Bullseye, witness tampering), Liz Ward Gracen (who Bill probably raped [1983] while she was Miss America – harassed/threats, 1997), Gennifer Flowers (break-ins, threats, 1992), Sally Perdue (car vandalism, threats, 1992), Bobbie Ann Williams (break-in), Christy Zercher (a flight attendant, groped 1992, break-in, 1994), Patrick Knowlton (extreme harassment campaign Oct. 1995; witness tampering), Suzi Parker (a journalist harassed off Arkansas tainted prison blood scandal 1999, fearing for her life), Connie Hamzy (lying campaign, 1991) and Juanita Broaddrick (raped by Bill 1978, break-in and IRS audit when she went public in 1998). It is not a stretch to say that Hillary, Bill and Buddy Young may have organized the murder of their former contract employee Jerry Parks on 9/26/93 because he knew too much about the Clintons.
Hillary and Bill were well on the way to crucifying Monica Lewinsky as an unstable stalker, liar and fantasist – – and would have done so if Bill’s semen had not been found on Monica’s blue dress. Hillary’s private eyes were already digging into Monica’s past, when the real story was the Clintons’ criminal track record.
Additionally, biographer Roger Morris describes a vicious sexual assault by Bill on a woman (around 1980) on p.238 in his book Parters in Power. Journalist Michael Isikoff details a extremely crude sexual advance by President Bill in 1996 on a lady married to a Democratic VIP on p.162 of his book Uncovering Clinton. Additionally, pervert Bill exposed himself to Paula Jones in May, 1991 and also to Carolyn Moffet in 1979.
Other Clinton dysfunctions include Bill’s cocaine addiction as governor, Hillary’s lesbianism and the fact that Chelsea is probably the seed of Webb Hubbell, NOT Bill Clinton. Bill’s only offspring is probably Danny Williams, the product of deadbeat dad Bill’s cocaine-fueled sex orgies with (no condoms) drug-addicted street hooker Bobbie Ann Williams and her girlfriends back in 1983-84. Bill paid $200 to Gennifer Flowers so she could have an abortion in Jan., 1978, just 3 months before Bill’s double rape of Juanita Broaddrick on 4-25-78. Bill severely bit Juanita’s lip to disable her during the rapes. Also, wild Bill, brother “Roger the Dodger” and best friend Dan Lasater were partying with high school girls and providing them cocaine when Bill was governor in the early 1980’s.
And, of course, there is Hillary’s long and intense affair with Vince Foster who was her emotional husband while Bill was screwing everything in sight. Hillary has a long record of fomenting domestic violence with Bill. The Secret Service, fed up with this insanity, leaked to the press Hillary smashing a lamp during an argument with Bill. Hillary has often thrown objects at victim Bill.
Hillary has used criminal tactics such as a secret police and illegal IRS audits to go after both political enemies and Bill’s sex victims and girlfriends. It was probably Clintons’ FBI who put a rotating harassment team of 25 people on Patrick Knowlton, a witness in the Vince Foster investigation, on October 26, 1995, and continuing for a week. What the Clintons did to Patrick Knowlton was Clinton street fascism as well as witness tampering.
This was a prelude to the intimidation campaign waged on Kathleen Willey in 1997-98 before her deposition in the Paula Jones case. Paula Jones who Bill exposed himself to, rape victim Juanita Broaddrick, probable rape victim Liz Ward Gracen, and mistress Gennifer Flowers all got audited by Clintons’ IRS in the late 1990’s.
Floyd Brown’s offices were burglarized in 1992 and only his Clinton files were stolen. Brown’s private phone conversations were illegally wiretapped by Hillary’s goon Jack Palladino. Another one of Hillary’s thugs, Anthony Pellicano is in jail in LA for the same kind goon tactics he did for the Clintons in 1992.
Clinton biographer Emmett Tyrrell also had his offices twice broken into and his NY apartment invaded once. The manuscript of Tyrrell’s book Boy Clinton was stolen when he couriered it to Robert Novak for a blurb. Clintons thugs tried to intimidate 2 of Tyrrell’s researchers in Little Rock.
Also, at least one independent counsel in the 1990’s took to carrying a gun after being harassed by Clinton goons in yet another intimidation event.
HILLARY TREATS PEOPLE LIKE DIRT
LIKE THEY ARE “INVISIBLE”
Many people close to the Clintons describe Hillary as rude, vulgar and abusive, not just with staff and co-workers, but especially with Bill who she made a sport of ridiculing, according to L.D. Brown, Bill’s favorite state trooper. Hillary is well known for making mean, vicious and personally degrading comments often towards people who work for and with her. She probably got that from her dad Hugh Rodham, a deeply disturbed man.
Hillary and Bill are sociopaths, not unlike serial killers such as Ted Bundy. Seemingly personable and normal while brown nosing wealthy contributors or opinion makers, Hillary and Bill have no regard for the integrity and well being of others. They disregard rules and lie with practiced ease, not feeling guilt or empathy for others.
Bill is the kind of guy who can rape your sister upstairs and then come down to the living room and tell you what a great book he has read about women’s rights. Hillary is the kind of person who can be in the kitchen calling up a secret police to terrify your rape victim sister into silence, and then come out to the living room and ask what do you think about her latest speech on women’s and children’s rights.
Some of the goons that Hillary has used to cover up her and Bill’s Jerry Springer lifestyle and criminal activity include Ivan Duda (1982), Jerry Parks (1980’s), Jack Palladino (1992) and Anthony Pellicano (1990’s). Pellicano is now in JAIL in Los Angeles for the same kind of thug intimidation tactics that Hillary hired him for. Also, Buddy Young, the head of Bill’s trooper detail and who Bill made #2 at FEMA, is additionally a dangerous criminal that Hillary and Bill has employed in their black operations. Terry Lenzer is also someone Hillary has used extensively.
Please forward this information to your Democratic friends and co-workers and ask that they (and you) vote for and support John Edwards, Barack OBAMA, Bill Richardson or any other Democratic candidate, and NOT Hillary. The difference is Hillary will break your kneecap to get to the White House; the others will not.
Thank-you and have a great day!
Robert Morrow Clinton expert Austin, TX 512-306-1510
[…] https://tygrrrrexpress.com/2007/12/light-a-candle-smack-a-woman/ […]