Barack Obama has just nominated Elana Kagan to be the next U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
Despite my having never been to Europe and not being a Catholic, I am going to see if he will nominate me to be Ambassador to the Vatican.
What is it about this man that “No Experience Necessary” is a way of life?
Barack Obama got elected by being a blank slate. He was all things to all people. Think of him as Mr. Potato Head. You can unattach and reattach everything about him, because he was whatever you wanted him to be. Perhaps Plastic Man would have been a better analogy.
Now he takes a woman who has never been a judge, and decides to put her on the top court in the land.
Some will say that the confirmation process will sort out what she stands for, who she is, and what she believes.
No it won’t.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg never discussed her abortion position, so everybody thought that silence meant moderation. It didn’t. She was hard left on the issue.
(There should be no litmus tests on specific issues, but she should have stated how she felt on the issue.)
This is where liberals get )the few that are not already) condescending and take cheap shots at George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. They had experience, they were bad, blah blah blah, experience is overrated.
No, it isn’t.
I often relate politics to football because some situations are highly analogous. The 21st century Detroit Lions are an example of what happens when experience is thrown under the bus.
The owner of the team picked Matt Millen as the president and general manager. Millen had no experience in management, only as a player. Millen hired Marty Morningwheg as head coach, despite his never having been a head coach. It is one thing to give a new general manager or head coach a fresh start, but not both of them at the same time. They bumbled and stumbled, and wrecked the organization.
This is what happened at the start of the Clinton administration. They came in singing Fleetwood Mac songs and put a bunch of neophytes in key jobs. They were overwhelmed. This does not make them bad people. It just made them incompetent. On the job training is not what the White House should be.
Adults like Erskine Bowles were brought in to restore order.
The same is happening with the Obama administration. Mr. Obama had no executive experience before becoming president. Janet Napolitano had no experience at her current job either. Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be the adult, but his tirades can only do so much.
Mr. Obama is symptomatic of what is wrong in America on this issue. We prize youth and beauty over wisdom. We force older workers into mandatory retirement so that new blood and fresh ideas can come in and make matters worse.
Elana Kagan may intrinsically be a good person. I have no idea. I know nothing about her. Nobody does.
I would say that I do not understand why she was picked, but I absolutely do. Somebody with no record cannot be attacked as easily. No opinions are better than controversial opinions.
In the real world that does not work. Having no credit score is not much better than a bad score.A lack of a negative is not a positive.
Republicans have to accept some basic facts. We lost the election. He gets to pick whoever he wants. He has the votes to ram her through because the GOP is way too gutless to even think of a filibuster. If the Republicans did filibuster, the left would howl that this was “unprecedented,” even though they would absolutely do it if it benefited them. Unprecedented is irrelevant in this case.
If she tries to avoid answering basic questions, then she absolutely should be denied.
Conservatives are not going to get Robert Bork in this climate. This does not mean they have to accept another Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The Republicans should absolutely consider dragging this out until it becomes an election issue. The elft will claim sexism, because that is the only ism that applies here.
Ms. Kagan absolutely should be given a fair hearing. However, if she is evasive, Mr. Obama does not get to do his famous “the discussion is closed” routine where he says “it is time to come together” in the name of conservatives shutting up and agreeing with him.
Also, if she has a “nanny problem” or some other issue that struck down prior nominees, she should not get special treatment. The practice of rules not applying to anything Mr. Obama says, does, or advances has to stop.
Does this woman believe in an evolving constitution, which is code for making things up as we go along?
Does she believe that global rulings by other courts can and should be part of he decision making process?
These are legitimate questions that deserve answers.
She deserves fairness. She does not deserve a coronation. We already had a coronation presidency (although he was democratically elected) and a coronation Supreme Court filled by a wise Latina woman who described herself accurately as mediocre.
(I wonder why this graciousness is not returned. Conservatives never get their nominees through without a hassle. It is always Republicans who have to give in, and they always do. Enough already.)
Barack Obama does not always rely on inexperienced people. He has repeatedly been given credit (rightfully so) for retaining Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense.
Yet too many times, the chameleon president selects chameleon nominees.
She may not be a hard left ideologue. Yet if she is, she and the president should just be honest about it.
The only thing I care about is whether she is qualified for the job.
When did experience become a negative?
Mr. Obama could have done much better. Time will tell if he could have done worse.
eric